Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- artificial_children [2026/07/29 05:53] – [Controversy] mecham
+++ artificial_children [2026/07/29 13:28] (current) – mecham
@@ Line 22: / Line 22: @@
   * HOLT | 75 Year Old Male | Near-Baseline
-===== Controversy =====
+===== Issues =====
-While the bodies of Artificial Children are considered aberrants, they are treated legally as OI because of the O3 inhabiting inside them, so they are granted the same rights as all other Order Intellects. Many within the Artificial Children Program have raised concerns over the ethics and morality of creating mindless human husks for this purpose.
-Furthermore, critics of the program point out the danger of nearly undetectable O3s defecting and operating against the Order. A plethora of safeguards have been installed into the Artificial Children to alleviate these worries.
 If the body is active but an O3 has not been implanted, the Artificial Child's original personality may return. More often than not, the body develops a new personality. At this stage, the aberrant is typically terminated.
@@ Line 32: / Line 28: @@
 There have been 2 recorded cases of an Artificial Child's original personality returning and rejecting the implanted O3.
-Gen I Artificial Children's minds could not properly handle hosting O3 intellects and would deteriorate within 2-5 years of operation. O3s had to be extracted before then to prevent data loss or core damage. This problem was alleviated with Gen III, utilizing a modified version of the Virtual's Algorithm, allowing OI data to map to human minds.
+Gen I Artificial Children's minds could not properly handle hosting O3 intellects and would deteriorate within 2-5 years of operation. O3s had to be extracted before then to prevent data loss or core damage. This problem was alleviated with Gen III, which utilized a modified version of the Virtual's Algorithm, allowing OI data to map to human minds.
+===== Controversy =====
+While the bodies of Artificial Children are considered aberrants, they are treated legally as OI because of the O3 inhabiting inside them, so they are granted the same rights as all other Order Intellects. Many within the Artificial Children Program have raised concerns over the ethics and morality of creating mindless human husks for this purpose. The official reason given is that since the hosts are cloned aberrants, they were never human to begin with.
+Furthermore, critics of the program point out the danger of nearly undetectable O3s defecting and operating against the Order. A plethora of safeguards have been installed into the Artificial Children to alleviate these worries.